back to main content page | back to welcome page | back to activities page |
EVALUATION ISSUES IN SCOUT PROJECT
quality criteria for e-learning |
http://www.caryacademy.pvt.k12.nc.us/historytech/Vol1no1/virtualclassroompage1.htm: HOW TO BUILD A VIRTUAL CLASSROOM
http://www.enmu.edu/virtual/virt.html links to resources for faculty interested in integrating technology into their teaching. It provides instructional ideas, templates, conceptual approaches, and examples.
http://tecfa.unige.ch/edu-comp/edu-ws94/contrib/schneider/schneide.fm.html Teaching & Learning with Internet Tools A Position Paperpresented at the Workshop on "Teaching & Learning with the Web" at the First International Conference on the World-Wide Web, 1994 at CERN, Geneva.Daniel Schneider, TECFA, FPSE, University of Geneva schneide@divsun.unige.ch - http://tecfa.unige.ch/
MULTI-LAYERED EVALUATION MODEL OF E-LEARNING IN SCOUT
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||
decision-making
evaluation:
evaluation as decision-making monitoring sees evaluation as collaborative decision-making in unpredictable contexts. (responsive constructivistic evaluation - Stake & Guba, 1980) |
focuses not so much on the end product of activities, rather on additional topic-unrelated learning that may turn up while the activity is ongoing. It focuses on opinion changes, attitude changes and personal development of the learning community by effect of the activity. | ||||||||||||||
1.implicit - hidden : data collection with record of mainstream opinions and attitudes. | monitoring tools: trainer reports, self-evaluation sheets -logs observation from external observers. | ||||||||||||||
|
2.responsive: active change in the planned course of the project if correction is needed. | top | |||||||||||||
3.dynamic : the group decides to change strategies to achieve the same goals and introduces innovations. | |||||||||||||||
top |
quality criteria for e-learning: general factors
structure | process | evaluation |
leadership | self-monitoring | evaluation of participation |
human resource | emotional scaffolding | evaluation of what has been learnt |
technology | possibility for the learner to transfer his/her new knowledge to socially sustainable area of his/her personal life and to other career contexts | |
clarity of organization | cost-benefit evaluation | |
efficacy of the proposed learning model | ||
user-friendly access |